Skip to content

AI Output to Evidence

AI workflows often need human review after generation. The original model result and the later human judgment should remain distinguishable.

source artifact → analysis run → immutable AI result → review event → validated or corrected result

Record enough context to identify:

  • source artifact;
  • analysis run;
  • model and relevant version;
  • original model output;
  • timestamp;
  • integrity identity where applicable.

A reviewer may:

  • confirm the output;
  • correct part of it;
  • reject it;
  • request another analysis.

Represent that action as a separate event linked to the original result.

Overwriting the model output destroys evidence about what the system actually produced.

Keeping the original output immutable allows later reviewers to distinguish:

  • model behavior;
  • human correction;
  • final accepted result.

This pattern is especially useful when verification, auditability, or regulated review requires a complete provenance chain.