Skip to content

Evidence Levels

Not all evidence supports the same kind of claim.

Architecture, contracts, runbooks, threat models, and design records can show intent, scope, and expected behavior.

They do not prove that a current build behaves as documented.

Reproducible examples, tests, conformance runs, and verification outputs can show that a specific workflow behaved as expected under defined conditions.

See Executable Verification Examples.

Build outputs, release checks, migration tests, backup/restore tests, and signed or hashed release artifacts can support statements about a specific release candidate or release.

The claim is bounded by the tested environments and procedures.

A controlled pilot can show that a workflow works in a real operational setting with an identified owner, defined inputs, and observed outcomes.

A pilot is not automatically production evidence.

Production evidence requires an actually operating workflow with a defined accountable owner, live status, and observed operational outcomes.

Independent assessment can add assurance when the reviewer, scope, method, version, and limitations are recorded.

External verification should not be represented as broader than the performed assessment.